OTHER LAWSUIT ISSUES

By Eric Glazer, Esq.

Published February 18, 2019

             We all know that the condo and HOA statutes contain differences that often times donít make any sense.  Letís review two more instances of there being no real justification for differences among the statutes.

               In an HOA, before the Board files suit, there is a statute they need to consider:

720.303(1): Before commencing litigation against any party in the name of the association involving amounts in controversy in excess of $100,000, the association must obtain the affirmative approval of a majority of the voting interests at a meeting of the membership at which a quorum has been attained.

               So, letís say there is a lawsuit contemplated against the developer involving amounts in excess of $100,000.00.  The statute clearly states that a vote of the owners is required before commencing litigation.

Interestingly enough, there is no similar provision in the condominium statute.  Why?  Why does the board have the power to file suit in one type of community but not in another type of community?

In a condominium, after a lawsuit is filed against an association, the association may have the following responsibility:

718.119(3) In any legal action in which the association may be exposed to liability in excess of insurance coverage protecting it and the unit owners, the association shall give notice of the exposure within a reasonable time to all unit owners, and they shall have the right to intervene and defend.

As Iím sure you guessed by now, there is no similar provision in the HOA statute.  Why do owners in a condo deserve to be told there may not be enough insurance, but HOA owners donít get the same courtesy?

Finally, 718.501 regarding condominiums states:

(2)(a) Each condominium association which operates more than two units shall pay to the division an annual fee in the amount of $4 for each residential unit in condominiums operated by the association. If the fee is not paid by March 1, the association shall be assessed a penalty of 10 percent of the amount due, and the association will not have standing to maintain or defend any action in the courts of this state until the amount due, plus any penalty, is paid.

Because HOAs are not regulated by the DBPR, HOAs are under no obligation to pay a $4.00 per unit fee.  Condos that donít however, are barred from the courthouse unless they do.

Itís like the more you dig, the more you see differences in condominium and HOA law that simply cannot be explained.  Iím starting to think that it may be time for one ďcommunity associationĒ statute rather than the often times silly differences that currently exist between the various community association statutes.  What are your thoughts?


HTML Comment Box is loading comments...

 

 

About HOA & Condo Blog

Eric Glazer Eric Glazer graduated from the University of Miami School of Law in 1992 after receiving a B.A. from NYU. He has practiced community association law for more than 2

decades and is the owner of Glazer and Associates, P.A. a seven attorney law firm with offices in Fort Lauderdale and Orlando and satellite offices in Naples, Fort Myers and Tampa.

 

Since 2009, Eric has been the host of Condo Craze and HOAs, a weekly one hour radio show that airs at noon each Sunday on 850 WFTL.

   

See: www.condocrazeandhoas.com.

   

He is the first attorney in the State of Florida that designed a course that certifies condominium residents as eligible to serve on a condominium Board of Directors and has now certified more than 10,000 Floridians all across the state. He is certified as a Circuit Court Mediator by The Florida Supreme Court and has mediated dozens of disputes between associations and unit owners. Eric also devotes significant time to advancing legislation in the best interest of Florida community association members.


Join Our CondoCraze & HOAs Email List
Email:  
For Email Marketing you can trust