By
Eric Glazer, Esq.
Published
February 4, 2013
If this were a football game, I would say that Jan
Bergemann and I helped get you to the red zone.
Our two bills have now been filed and have numbers
assigned to them. IT'S
NOW UP TO ALL OF YOU TO CALL YOUR LOCAL SENATOR AND HOUSE MEMBER
AND DEMAND THAT THEY VOTE IN FAVOR OF THESE BILLS!
Our request for changes to the H.O. A. laws were
broken down in two different bills.
The first bill is number SB
580. Here is
what it proposes:
1.
Just like in a condominium, require members of
H.O.A. Boards to become certified.
Shouldn't HOA Board members be required to know the law
as well?
2.
Just like in a condominium, the HOA statute would
be amended to prohibit officers and directors from receiving any
type of kickbacks from vendors who are awarded HOA contracts.
3.
Just like in a condominium, the HOA statute would
be amended to require HOA directors and officers who want to do
business with the association to
disclose the relationship, and have two-thirds of the
other directors vote in favor of same.
4.
Just like in a condominium, directors or officers
who are arrested for stealing association funds would be removed
from the Board pending a determination of their charges.
5.
Just like in a condominium, the association would
be required to purchase insurance or fidelity bonding for all
persons who handle association funds.
6.
Just like in a condominium, access to records
would be available within five days.
However, now the association would no longer be allowed
to charge personnel fees at an hourly rate to owners who want
copies. Owners would
also be allowed to use a cell phone or camera of their own to
photocopy the records.
To
say that passage of the above bill should be a no brainer, is an
understatement. The
provisions are obviously beneficial and already work for
condominiums. No
legislator should have a legitimate quarrel with any of the
foregoing measures unless they support kickbacks, lack of
education, self-dealing, stealing and over charging owners for
copies of records.
The
second bill, numbered S
596 attempts to do the following
-
Just
like in condominiums, HOA's would now be regulated by the
Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
All owners would be required to pay $4.00 per year to
the Division. In
return, the Division would be able to provide document
examiners, answer questions, provide educational materials,
investigate wrongdoing, investigate developers and more.
-
All
HOA's would be required to utilize the election procedures
that condominiums use. If
20% of eligible voters participate in the election, the
election will be valid and no longer would a 30% quorum of
unit owners be required to attend the annual meeting in
order to have a valid election.
The condo election statute works and the HOA election
procedures are woefully inadequate.
-
Developers
of HOA's seem to maintain control of the association
forever; sometimes even decades after the community is
built. Our
proposed legislation would require turnover of the
association to control of the unit owners when development
of all of the parcels that will ultimately be operated by
the homeowners' association has been completed, some of the
parcels have been conveyed to members, and no other parcels
are being offered for sale by the developer in the ordinary
course of business; When some of the parcels have been
conveyed to members and no other parcels are being
constructed or offered for sale by the developer in the
ordinary course of business; When the developer files a
petition seeking protection in bankruptcy; or When a
receiver for the developer is appointed by a circuit court
and is not discharged within 30 days after such appointment,
unless the court determines, within 30 days after
appointment of the receiver, that transfer of control would
be detrimental to the homeowners' association or its
members. NO MORE
LIFETIME DICTATORSHIPS.
No
doubt you will hear from some Legislators that this second bill
is more difficult for them to pass.
You will hear grumblings about the cost to the State to
expand the DBPR to now oversee H.O.A.'s in addition to
condominiums. It's
hogwash. Don't
believe it and don't stand for it.
The $4.00 per unit paid by condominium unit owners
more than covers the budget for the DBPR.
In fact, despite the fact that this money is technically
earmarked for a trust fund, the Florida Legislature has used it
time and again for general revenue purposes.
There are far more H.O.A. units than there are
condominium units. Therefore,
the State would financially prosper even more if this bill were
to pass. It would be
completely funded by the $4.00 per unit each HOA member would
pay. Surveys have
shown that HOA members would gladly pay $4.00 per year for the
same benefits that condominium owners receive from the Division.
If HOA members want to be regulated and pay for it, why
should legislators stand in the way?
By
the way…..if anyone can intelligently tell me why condominiums
are subject to DBPR regulation but HOA's are not, I'm all ears.
There's a dysfunctional and untruthful way of thinking
out there that suggests there's a significant difference between
these two types of communities that simply isn't there.
There is just no justification for regulation of one, but
not the other.
The
H.O.A. statute stinks when it comes to administering elections.
It is far less trustworthy than condominium elections and
breeds disinterest. Adopting
the condominium voting system is long overdue.
Finally,
there are just too many stories out there of HOA communities
being under developer control for decades.
Any statute that even remotely addresses this issue
should be passed without a second look.
So
here we are…….We drafted the legislation and had it
sponsored by representatives in both the House and The Senate.
To be frank, the rest is up to you.
How about each of you do two things?
Respond to this
blog below, which I will treat as a petition to The
Florida
Legislature to pass these two bills.
Then, make the effort to call your local Senator and
House member and urge their support.
Both of these things shouldn't take you more than about
ten minutes. Unless
of course you're happy with the way things are.