THE
MOTHER OF ALL
BATTLES - GETTING ACCESS TO RECORDS
By
Eric Glazer, Esq.
Published
July 16, 2012
To
simplify, I like to say that any document that could be, might
be or appears to be an official record of the association
probably is. To
further simplify, every unit owner in both a condo and an HOA
can see all the official records with very few exceptions.
(Even the accounting ledger for your unit)
Those exceptions basically are:
1. Any record protected
by the lawyer-client privilege;
2.
Information obtained by an association in connection with
the approval of the lease, sale, or other transfer of a unit;
3.
Personnel records of association or management company
employees, including, but not limited to, disciplinary, payroll,
health, and insurance records;
4.
Medical records of unit owners;
5.
Social security numbers, driver’s license numbers,
credit card numbers, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers,
facsimile numbers, emergency contact information, addresses of a
unit owner other than as provided to fulfill the association’s
notice requirements, and other personal identifying information
of any person, excluding the person’s name, unit designation,
mailing address, property address, and any address, e-mail
address, or facsimile number provided to the association to
fulfill the association’s notice requirements.
In a condo, the records must be made available to a unit owner
within 5 working days after receipt of a written request by the
board or its designee. HOA
owners have to wait longer, 10 days.
HOA owners are
forced to pay more for access to and copies of records than
owners in a condominium. In
an HOA, the association may charge up to 50 cents per page for
copies made on the association’s photocopier, whereas a
condominium can only charge a reasonable expense.
The
bigger problem is that in an HOA, if the association does not
have a photocopy machine available where the records are kept,
or if the records requested to be copied exceed 25 pages in
length, the association may have copies made by an outside
vendor or association management company personnel and may
charge the actual cost of copying, including any reasonable
costs involving personnel fees and charges at an hourly rate for
vendor or employee time to cover administrative costs to the
vendor or association.
Last
week, I was somewhat surprised by some of the comments from our
readers of the blog. Not
everyone was sympathetic to the plight of licensed Florida CAMs.
If there is one statute to blame for why some people feel
this way, the access to record statute may be the one.
Despite the fact that the statute was clearly designed to
allow the association to pass on the actual costs of what the
management company charges to respond to records requests from
owners, many CAMS and/or management companies have interpreted
this statute to mean that they are now at liberty to charge
exorbitant fees to HOA owners who want access to records and who
must pay these fees up front.
That is not the statute's intent and ultimately rest
assured that a court will make an example of a management
company who goes too far.
In
a condo, the failure of an association to provide access
to the records within 10 working days after receipt of a written
request allows the owner to file an arbitration action against
the association for at least $50 per calendar day for up to 10
days, beginning on the 11th working day after receipt of the
written request and for reimbursement of reasonable attorney’s
fees. So, be aware
that arbitrators routinely award an owner $500.00 in damages,
thousands in attorney's fees and costs and enter an order
requiring the association to permit access to the records.
In
an HOA, an owner deprived of access to records must first go to
mediation. If that
fails, it's off to court to seek the same remedies that condo
owners get in arbitration.
Keep in mind that both the condo and HOA statute only
requires that the association provide "access" to the
records. It does not
require the association to mail copies of records to owners who
demand that the association send them documents in the mail.
The association is not under any obligation whatsoever to
respond to records requests by mail.
In
both a condo and an HOA, the association may adopt reasonable
rules regarding the frequency, time, location, notice, and
manner of record inspections and copying.
These rules however must be reasonable and cannot serve
to act as a deterrent to a unit owner who demands access.
Decisions by the arbitrators who have ruled on these
issues generally state that associations who are larger and have
full-time staff will not be able to create rules that
dramatically restrict the days and hours that unit owners are
allowed to inspect records whereas associations that are small,
self managed and have few resources may be more restrictive.
Before passing a rule, associations are wise to ask their
counsel first if their proposed rule would pass scrutiny.
Finally,
the association may offer the option of making the records
available to a unit owner electronically via the Internet or by
allowing the records to be viewed in electronic format on a
computer screen and printed upon request.
THIS IS A GREAT IDEA!
Many associations have embraced technology and have
created a website for their association, posting all of the
association's official records, while restricting access solely
to unit owners. These
associations will generally tell you that as a result of posting
the official records on the website, records requests are
dramatically down, the association's office is not bogged down
responding to requests, and the community association manager is
happier spending his or her time on other pressing issues.
If
anyone can think of a good reason why it should be more
difficult and expensive for HOA owners to get access to records
than condo owners, please let me know.
I'm certainly stumped for an answer.
I'm afraid to ask……but how about telling us some
record request horror stories of your own?