SHOULD YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO RENT YOUR CONDO OR YOUR HOME?

By Jan Bergemann

Published February 28, 2014

  

Since it’s your property, you definitely should have the right to rent it out -- within certain limits. Renting out your property is not always a decision caused by the idea of making profits. Health, job change or many other reasons may cause you to make it necessary to rent out your property! It's not something you can easily predict -- and it's often not your choice to make it necessary to rent out your property.

 

In 2004, long before the foreclosure crisis, we fought long and hard in Tallahassee to get one single sentence added to Florida statutes FS 718.110: (13) An amendment prohibiting unit owners from renting their units or altering the duration of the rental term or specifying or limiting the number of times unit owners are entitled to rent their units during a specified period applies only to unit owners who consent to the amendment and unit owners who acquire title to their units after the effective date of that amendment.

 

This single sentence was the legislative response to the ruling of the Florida Supreme Court: Woodside v. Jahren – and that provision is still valid today.

 

This court-ruling caused a lot of hardship among owners who had bought investment property for the sole purpose to rent it out. With the help of Senator James King (†) we succeeded to get this sentence added, protecting such owners against new rules prohibiting them from renting out their units.

 

But obviously this clear sentence is too strong and too precise for certain attorneys who make their money by creating disputes. This year we see another attempt to water down this provision in companion bills H807/S798 (Moraitis/Ring):

(13) An amendment that prohibits prohibiting unit owners from renting their units or altering the duration of the rental term or that specifies or limits specifying or limiting the number of times unit owners are entitled to rent their units during a specified period does not apply applies only to unit owners who voted against consent to the amendment. However, such amendment applies to unit owners who consented to the amendment, who failed to cast a vote, or and unit owners who acquired acquire title to their units after the effective date of the that amendment.

 

On first view it doesn’t look like much of a change, but as usual the problem is in the detail. And that’s the trap hidden in this amended provision – called a clarification in order to deceive unsuspecting owners. Like usual: Nothing is further from the truth. Remember the fact that the original language required an owner to agree to the rule change – in writing. Now – if this provision is enacted – it allows this rule to be imposed on people who just didn’t vote on approval/disapproval of this new rule. 

 

Don’t forget, it is common practice for owners who don’t agree with amendments not to vote at all, since no-votes don’t count for anything. By law a certain percentage of “votes of approval” are required to pass an amendment. So, if this “clarification” to existing law passes, people who don’t vote – or are even not informed that such a vote is taking place – will lose their voting rights without even knowing it – and more costly lawsuits (billing hours) are in the making.

That’s why I always say: Don’t trust lawyers’ lobbying groups claiming to lobby “for” associations – and legislators who file such bills that are clearly against the interests of owners!

 

Oh, by the way: As usual homeowners owning property in homeowners’ associations don’t have such consumer protection at all. They are – as usual – treated like step-children of society!


HTML Comment Box is loading comments...
 
Jan Bergemann Jan Bergemann is president of Cyber Citizens For Justice, Florida 's largest state-wide property owners' advocacy group. CCFJ works on legislation to help owners living in community  

associations. He moved to Florida in 1995 - hoping to retire. He moved into a HOA, where the developer cheated the homeowners and used the association dues for his own purposes. End of retirement!

 

CCFJ was born in the year 2000, when some owners met in Tallahassee - finding out that power is only in numbers. Bergemann was a member of Governor Jeb Bush's HOA Task force in 2003/2004.

 

The organization has two websites to inform interested Florida homeowners and condo owners:

News Website: http://www.ccfj.net/.

Educational Website: http://www.ccfjfoundation.net/.

   
We think that only owners can really represent owners, since all service providers surely have a different interest! We are trying to create owner-friendly laws, but the best laws are useless without enforcement. And enforcement is totally lacking in Florida !


Join the 

CCFJ Email List
Email:  

For Email Marketing you can trust