HOW REASONABLE IS REASONABLE?

By Jan Bergemann

Published March 15, 2013

  

It sounds easy when you are being told to create “REASONABLE RULES” – right? But believe me, it’s not the word RULES that creates the headaches, it’s the word “REASONABLE” that causes the fight over rules boards are trying to create.

 

Make no mistake, what some folks think is reasonable, others may find absolutely unreasonable. And that’s when the legal fight starts.

 

There is no test method that produces a definite test result, telling you what’s reasonable – and what’s not. It’s a matter of opinion – and we all know that opinions differ widely. 

 

Look at the explanation given by Merriam Webster for the word “REASONABLE.”

  

Definition of REASONABLE:

a : being in accordance with reason <a reasonable theory>

b : not extreme or excessive <reasonable requests>

c : moderate, fair <a reasonable chance> <a reasonable price>

d : inexpensive

 

These definitions already tell you that there is no definite statement for the word “REASONABLE.”

Lots of lawsuit have been filed arguing this word. And even judges couldn’t really make their mind up whether reasonable is really reasonable.

 

Because of the many fights over “reasonable rules” Representative Jeff Kottkamp filed in 2007 a bill that created FS 720.3035, hoping to minimize the damage caused by “reasonable rules”. His approach in short: Limiting the rule-making authority to issues that were already part of the original governing documents. It still doesn’t explain the word “reasonable”, but eliminates many reasons for lawsuits. Boards can’t even make “reasonable” rules to determine the color of the front door, if the original governing documents didn’t create rules for front door colors.

 

But did that stop the legal wars over “reasonable rules?” Definitely not – and I don’t think the argument will ever end! 

 

How reasonable is it – for example – to say that a goldfish in a fish tank is a pet – and can’t be allowed in a no-pet community? It only opens up the next argument: Selective enforcement! "If my neighbor has a goldfish I can have a pit bull!" Makes sense? I don’t think so!

 

So the question is still left unanswered: HOW REASONABLE IS REASONABLE?


Or do you have an answer?


 
All fields are mandatory!

Select your rating:           

 

 

characters left

Powered by Citricle

Jan Bergemann

Jan Bergemann is president of Cyber Citizens For Justice, Florida 's largest state-wide property owners' advocacy group. CCFJ works on legislation to help owners living in community

associations. He moved to Florida in 1995 - hoping to retire. He moved into a HOA, where the developer cheated the homeowners and used the association dues for his own purposes. End of retirement!

  

CCFJ was born in the year 2000, when some owners met in Tallahassee - finding out that power is only in numbers. Bergemann was a member of Governor Jeb Bush's HOA Task force in 2003/2004.

  

The organization has two websites to inform interested Florida homeowners and condo owners:

News Website: http://www.ccfj.net/.

Educational Website: http://www.ccfjfoundation.net/.

   
We think that only owners can really represent owners, since all service providers surely have a different interest! We are trying to create owner-friendly laws, but the best laws are useless without enforcement. And enforcement is totally lacking in Florida !

Join the 

CCFJ Email List
Email:  

For Email Marketing you can trust

loading