SLANDER/LIBEL = SLAPP SUIT

By Jan Bergemann

Published April 5, 2013

  

I really have to laugh sometimes when I read the so-called slander/libel lawsuits filed by association attorneys on behalf of board members. What they call libel/slander is nothing more than an often not even aggressive worded opinion criticizing the actions of board members. If a private website is involved these attorneys even throw in “trademark infringement”.

 

Since these attorneys have supposedly passed the BAR exam they should know full well that all these claims will not stick. But that is actually not the reason these lawsuits are being filed. In reality these lawsuits are nothing else but SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) suits, aimed at shutting up the owners who dared to voice opposition to the board members, or sometimes just the board president only.

 

Throwing in the claim of trademark infringement is just more nonsense, dreamed up by attorneys who know full well that they don’t really have a leg to stand on. But the idea behind these lawsuits is not to really win the law suit and get a judgment against the defendant, the idea is to force the defendant to spend lots of money for the legal defense of these lawsuits – money these defendants often don’t have. Board members and their attorneys count on the fact that lots of filed motions and depositions will cost the defendant much more than he/she can afford, forcing the defendant to waive the white flag as a sign of surrender. We have seen cases where the attorney for the board wanted to depose all the neighbors who had dared to post a comment on the private website of the dissident.

 

Claiming “trademark infringement” is even more nonsense. Imagine we talk about the Seashore Homeowners’ Association and the owner under fire dared to call his website “seashoreowners.com” In all honesty, how can that be a trademark infringement? Or did this attorney file suit against all the companies who use the word “SEASHORE” in their name?

 

To anybody looking at these lawsuits it is abundantly clear that these lawsuits are filed under the old motto: “The more “shit” (sorry!) you throw against the wall, the more you can hope will stick!”

 

We have over the years seen many of these frivolous lawsuits being dismissed by the plaintiffs shortly before they reached the court room for trial. At that time board members and their attorney had already reached their actual goal: Forcing the owner to spend lots of money for his/her legal defense without a chance to recover these cost without filing a new lawsuit. Remarks made by board members after the dismissal of cases like this to other owners made it very clear: The lawsuits served as well as a warning to other owners to shut up, or lose as well lots of money trying to defend such a lawsuit.

 

In my opinion these lawsuits are a clear abuse of power and a total waste of good association money. Make no mistake: Board members wouldn’t even consider filing these lawsuits if they would have to pay for it themselves. But since they can use association funds, their attitude clearly is: Who cares?

 

The claim that these dissidents damage the good reputation of the association and destroy property values by making existing problems public is plainly ridiculous.

 

The truth: Property values are destroyed by dubious actions of the board members, not by the folks that make them public! Or do you want to blame the newspapers criticizing the wrongdoing of our politicians?

 

In my opinion the people actually guilty in the filing of these lawsuits that are a clear abuse of power and money: The attorneys filing these suits and milking these cases for every billing hour possible!

These lawsuits are just filed for one purpose: To serve the EGO of the board members claiming that their name – and the association’s name – were libeled and slandered!  

 

Maybe the legislature should consider enacting a bill that would hold board members personally liable for all legal fees – if they lose the lawsuit or have it dismissed before it reaches the court room.

 

I bet that would stop this nonsense in its tracks!


 
All fields are mandatory!

Select your rating:           

 

 

characters left

Powered by Citricle

Jan Bergemann

Jan Bergemann is president of Cyber Citizens For Justice, Florida 's largest state-wide property owners' advocacy group. CCFJ works on legislation to help owners living in community

associations. He moved to Florida in 1995 - hoping to retire. He moved into a HOA, where the developer cheated the homeowners and used the association dues for his own purposes. End of retirement!

  

CCFJ was born in the year 2000, when some owners met in Tallahassee - finding out that power is only in numbers. Bergemann was a member of Governor Jeb Bush's HOA Task force in 2003/2004.

  

The organization has two websites to inform interested Florida homeowners and condo owners:

News Website: http://www.ccfj.net/.

Educational Website: http://www.ccfjfoundation.net/.

   
We think that only owners can really represent owners, since all service providers surely have a different interest! We are trying to create owner-friendly laws, but the best laws are useless without enforcement. And enforcement is totally lacking in Florida !

Join the 

CCFJ Email List
Email:  

For Email Marketing you can trust

loading