SCREENING NEW OWNERS AND/OR TENANTS?

By Jan Bergemann

Published August 16, 2013

    

Be careful what you wish for! One can fill a whole book with stories from associations that lost their shirts in lawsuits over denying an applicant – be it a potential buyer or a potential tenant.

 

Before you even start, make really sure that your governing documents actually allow you to screen potential owners/tenants. And don’t listen to your CAM who might tell you that you can! He/she is the first one fleeing the scene if you run into problems.

 

Many governing documents just don’t allow “screening” – and if your governing documents don’t specifically allow screening --- don’t even get the idea.

 

But even if your governing docs allow screening, make sure that you have “reasonable” written guidelines in place that point out what reasons will lead to denial of the application. Make sure your guidelines don’t violate any “Fair Housing” laws. Make sure that your guidelines don’t discriminate against anybody. That could get really expensive! It could happen that the applicant suddenly owns your building – depending on the jury verdict.

 

Before you even hold the first interview of a possible new owner or a new tenant, make sure you have guidelines that show ahead of time which applicants you will reject. Don’t make up rules “as you go along.” You endanger the financial welfare of your neighbors!

 

And remember, the maximum charge for such an application is $100 – for the whole family – not $100 for each of the members of the family. I just recently saw a demand for $400 sent to a family with two kids! The father informed the "future" landlord saying Thanks -- but no thanks -- and the landlord who just lost a potential renter was fuming! 

 

Screening is not supposed to be a moneymaker for board or CAM – it’s intended to weed out the bad apples – if that’s even possible.

 

Don’t create unreasonable time limits. I just saw a case where the association limited lease contracts to six months max – so they can screen – and charge for it – every six months.

 

Rejecting a renter because of a low credit score? Make sure you understand that the renter pays the rent to the landlord, the owner of the condo/home he/she wants to rent – not to the association. The deeded owner is still liable for paying the association dues – even if the unit is rented out. Remember how the system really works: Persons with a high credit score are normally already paying for lots of loans they took out for all kinds of purposes. The more they already pay for loans, the less is left to pay the rent! Ever thought about it?

If you feel that you have the right to judge other people, deciding if they are worth living in your community, you should make sure that you are using common sense – and not prejudice.
 
Be careful what you wish for! You really don’t want the denied applicant to own your building.


HTML Comment Box is loading comments...
Jan Bergemann

Jan Bergemann is president of Cyber Citizens For Justice, Florida 's largest state-wide property owners' advocacy group. CCFJ works on legislation to help owners living in community

associations. He moved to Florida in 1995 - hoping to retire. He moved into a HOA, where the developer cheated the homeowners and used the association dues for his own purposes. End of retirement!

  

CCFJ was born in the year 2000, when some owners met in Tallahassee - finding out that power is only in numbers. Bergemann was a member of Governor Jeb Bush's HOA Task force in 2003/2004.

  

The organization has two websites to inform interested Florida homeowners and condo owners:

News Website: http://www.ccfj.net/.

Educational Website: http://www.ccfjfoundation.net/.

   
We think that only owners can really represent owners, since all service providers surely have a different interest! We are trying to create owner-friendly laws, but the best laws are useless without enforcement. And enforcement is totally lacking in Florida !

Join the 

CCFJ Email List
Email:  

For Email Marketing you can trust