VOLUNTARY MEANS VOLUNTARY – NOT MANDATORY!

By Jan Bergemann

Published August 2, 2013

  

I always wonder why certain people don’t want to understand the big difference between the words “VOLUNTARY” and “MANDATORY” – what’s so difficult?

 

A community that was created as a voluntary association – or civic association – can only be changed to a mandatory association by the written approval of ALL deeded owners. So says the law!

 

Some “smart” board members and their attorneys have unsuccessfully tried to use the revitalization process that was created as result of the HOA Task Force Bill in 2004 (FS 720.403-720.407) to turn a voluntary association into a mandatory association. A little hint to these “smart” folks: You can only revitalize what has been in existence before. Revitalization doesn’t mean that you can create something that never existed before.

 

Especially licensed attorneys, who supposedly passed the BAR exam, should know better. I really have to laugh sometimes about the reasoning used by these attorneys trying to make the impossible possible – by twisting words.

  

And it’s just amazing to see what methods certain board members use trying to force neighbors into joining a mandatory association that never existed before. From threats of shutting off the water to threatening neighbors with a gun – we have seen it all, especially here in Central Florida where many older communities were created as civic associations, but have certain amenities serving – and are common property of -- the owners living in this “voluntary” association.

 

How do you think some owners living since 30 years in a civic association felt when they received a letter written by an attorney telling them that their water would be shut off if they don’t sign a joinder making them a member of a newly formed mandatory homeowners’ association?

  

Owners in another voluntary association looked into the barrel of a gun when they tried to enter common property, fenced in by the board president who wants everybody to join “his” mandatory association. The real joke: A deputy called by these owners after being threatened with a gun explained that the board president was within his rights – he was “protecting” his fence. Some deputies really don’t have much understanding of the laws. I think that’s one of the reasons why a lot of folks claim the name of this state should be spelled “FLORI-DUH!”

  

Neighborhood wars are pretty common, but when these wars are based on the totally false interpretation of the word voluntary, it’s really getting ridiculous.

 

Before starting a war over the interpretation of the word “voluntary” board members should check the “Merriam Webster” dictionary in case they just had the measles when the word “voluntary” was explained in school:

Definition of VOLUNTARY

1: proceeding from the will or from one's own choice or consent

2: unconstrained by interference : self-determining

3: done by design or intention : intentional <voluntary manslaughter>

4: of, relating to, subject to, or regulated by the will <voluntary behavior>

5: having power of free choice

6: provided or supported by voluntary action <a voluntary organization>

7: acting or done of one's own free will without valuable consideration or legal obligation

 

Lots of good owners’ money has been wasted by dictatorial-minded board members who were not happy to rule over a voluntary kingdom. Their way of thinking: Any good “DICTATORSHIP” has to be MANDATORY!

 

And these "dictators"  try any “method” to convince their neighbors that as of now – as soon as they made the decision – the civic association is a mandatory homeowners’ association – without asking for the consent of neighbors.

 

From plain blackmail to the threat of physical harm everything seems to be allowed in these neighborhood wars – and not even attorneys seem to be ashamed to support such dictatorships. I guess billing hours are more important than ethics?

 

We have seen many wars over this issue: Mandatory -- or just voluntary Homeowners' Association?

To give all the folks living in these civic associations a peace of mind: To my knowledge none of these “dictators” ever won the war! But even the attempt to create new dictatorships is really frustrating for owners who choose to live in a voluntary civic association!


HTML Comment Box is loading comments...
Jan Bergemann

Jan Bergemann is president of Cyber Citizens For Justice, Florida 's largest state-wide property owners' advocacy group. CCFJ works on legislation to help owners living in community

associations. He moved to Florida in 1995 - hoping to retire. He moved into a HOA, where the developer cheated the homeowners and used the association dues for his own purposes. End of retirement!

  

CCFJ was born in the year 2000, when some owners met in Tallahassee - finding out that power is only in numbers. Bergemann was a member of Governor Jeb Bush's HOA Task force in 2003/2004.

  

The organization has two websites to inform interested Florida homeowners and condo owners:

News Website: http://www.ccfj.net/.

Educational Website: http://www.ccfjfoundation.net/.

   
We think that only owners can really represent owners, since all service providers surely have a different interest! We are trying to create owner-friendly laws, but the best laws are useless without enforcement. And enforcement is totally lacking in Florida !

Join the 

CCFJ Email List
Email:  

For Email Marketing you can trust